just adding: the 10% rule is only a strict requirement for indirect qualifying, not for direct qualifying. But it is a requirement if you want to grade out your tournament >100%TGP - f.e. group matchplay 12 rounds with 100 participants and then PAPA-style finals top8 maxes out at 100% (instead of 36 games towards TGP/144%)
right, so with 6.0 if directplay tourney/league has less than 10% into a final, they will be sanctioned events but limited to 100% max.
If they want to get 100-200% they would need to take between 10-50% from qual to finals-
Right now, Escher’s lowest top-20 result is worth about 86 WPPRs. Jeff Teolis, now ranked 50th, has his Highest result at 82 WPPRs and change. That’s what all these WPPR boosts do when just 2 players are making the most of them. Go back to v5 and it’s nothing at all like that.
That’s a Josh question. The whole “better” (or not) issue has been beaten to death in this thread and on various other boards, e.g. Discord. Some of us disagree with certain elements or numerical factors of the new scheme while still agreeing that other portions of it have merit. I’m just along for the ride at this point.
That was less a philosophical question and more “I don’t understand what the major difference is between v5 and v6 or what this means in a larger context of how WPPRs are calculated.” Although apparently it’s actually related to 5.7 to 5.8…
So let’s call the whole thing off
WPPR-geddon is upon us! Just five more days until it happens.
For some of us it’ll be just like Thanos’ snap, and for others it’ll be like Tony Stark’s For most of the pinball world, though, it’ll just be another day …
My bad. Since the spreadsheet was just an estimate (doesn’t account for us dropping from top 20 to 15 on your resume, and doesn’t take into account SOS), I got lazy updating it after we finalized our plans for next year.