Encouraging participation when the same top players tend to win

Just because you can’t understand there own reasoning doesn’t mean it’s the saddest thing you’ve heard. Ironically, enough in your list you mist the 100% most common reason I hear why people are starting to think about not playing in larger events. It’s restrictions. That’s the reason why I’m done traveling for events myself. I am A restricted. Have I ever won a tournament, nope. Will I ever win a tournament, probably not but I’m still A restricted. The part that bugs me is that I go to these events now, don’t qualify and can’t play in B while people that I consider better than me (that just don’t travel) get to play in B. They win money in B, and I don’t have the chance. But for me, qualifying isn’t fun, it’s the bracket play that I enjoy. Being A restricted and not being good enough to realistically win anything is what puts sour grapes in a lot of peoples mouths.

I understand the argument on why, it’s because it’s felt that someone in the top 500 is to good to play in anything other than A as the other players wont stand a chance at winning if they were allowed in B. But, IMHO, that segregates a large number of people that now stand really no chance in A and now no chance in B. I’ve made the decision that I wont travel anymore unless I’m not restricted anymore. Whether the community feels that’s a good thing (that people like me stop coming to events) or a bad thing, I don’t know.

4 Likes