Sounds a lot like clothing at department stores perpetually being on sale or having prices compared against a competitor’s when the clothing is in fact full price, and the non-sale price is used only to claim it’s on sale and the so-called competitor nonexistent.
I definitely understand the psychological effects of that. JC Penney once tried to do away with those sorts of tricks, and it flopped on them big time. Extra Credits did a brief video on what happened with JC Penney and the consumer state of mind. (You can watch the Firefall stuff if you’d like, but that’s besides the purpose.) So in this stance, I can now understand why Stern made the decision it did. Doesn’t mean I’m satisfied with it, but it does make more sense now.
Not sure about trades. I’m thinking it’s intended for anyone who would plan on flipping it as soon as they acquired it. Would be pretty easy to monitor the Internet for people trying to do so publicly. As for a private transaction among friends/neighbors… I doubt that’s enforceable.
I don’t know if this is too late of a reply or not, but I just realized that this machine is the one that Stern gave the codename “Shark” to. As in the Bat Shark Repellent.
Yup. We got an email tip for the podcast a while back. The code names were:
Harold - Ghostbusters
Shark - Batman 66
Toys - Aerosmith
Cinnabon - likely Star Wars